This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Hello, Malinda, I'll mostly just answer on the breaking point. For all practical computations on piano scales, the breaking point of the wire (that is given to us by the wire maker) is lessened 25 % - the new value is then considered breaking point and we try to get the strings in a zone where they are know to tone well, admittedly it is around 50 to 70% of this lessened breaking point (hence your comment). This is called solicitation of the string , don't know if the term is correct in English. The problem we meet when repairing older instruments (before 1930) , that where build when the wire makers produce strings that where less resistive to tension (less stiff also) and when we use modern wire on them, is that the solicitation gets very poor, and the tone suffer - often it gets harsh, a little like with pianos that lack down bearing, too explosive and not singing enough. We have the same on modern instruments, for instance STEINWAY O, first plain wire B2 length 1110 mm , wire1025 mm the solicitation is 35% of the (lessened breaking point) - while the tension is 491 Newton, not high but acceptable. If on that piano you tune 1 whole step lower the tension will be 383 N the iH goes up and the solicitation get even poorer at 26 % - I doubt any pianist agree with the tone then If you tune any piano 1/2 step lower the tone get horrible because of this . Stephen Paulello push us to mix wire of different stiffness in order to keep the solicitation consistent toward the break he computed that the iH stay the same as well as the tension so it may be worth a try . As the wire he produce is covering a wide range it is possible (BTW I've seen the wire delivered and it is better looking than Roslau actually, cleaner, more shiny). Back to the dinner table now. Happy New year everyone. Isaac Pianotech Isaac OLEG accordeur - reparateur - concert 19 rue Jules Ferry 94400 VITRY sur SEINE oleg-i@noos.fr tel: fax: mobile: 033 01 47 18 06 98 33 01 47 18 06 90 033 06 60 42 58 77 Powered by Plaxo Want a signature like this? Add me to your address book... -----Message d'origine----- De : pianotech-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org]De la part de Malinda Dobrins Envoyé : mercredi 31 décembre 2003 18:01 À : Pianotech Objet : Re: Depowering a Piano I think I have an answer to your string breaking problem. All strings have a point at which they will break. The engineers have designed strings to be below the breaking point by 30% or more. Once the energy imparted into the string exceeds this percentage the string usually breaks. Since we can't control the increased energy put in by the pianist, we can control the breaking point percentage. The easiest way to do this is to lower the whole piano 100 cents (a half step). The lower tension thus created willl increase the breaking pooint percentage and thus absorb the increased energy before the string breakage occurs. Of course, this can't be done when playing with other instruments unless the players of the other instruments are willing to transpose to the piano and vice versa. Recently I was in Atlantic City at a cascino where a piano player was playing a Yamaha grand piano. Playing along with him was a bass fiddler. The piano player was also a pounder. During a break I asked him if he had string breakage problems. He said no because his tuner was tuning the piano a half step lower and thus solved the problem of string breakage for him. I assume that the bass fiddler transposed his playing to fit the piano. Hope this is helpful. Lee Dobrins ----- Original Message ----- From: Farrell To: pianotech@ptg.org Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 4:39 PM Subject: Depowering a Piano Yamaha C3, piano bar in nightclub. Serviced every two weeks. Always been a good piano in very good condition. New piano player for last two or three months. The guy is a major pounder. Lots of broken bass strings (maybe 10 in the last two months - never before). The key bushings have also gone from excellent condition to slapping neighboring keys. The guy I work for requested that I depower the piano by decreasing blow distance and, correspondingly, key dip. Seems like a good idea. I had not heard of that approach before. Seems to me the piano player will notice it and not like it. But that is just my guess. I reduced dip in the bass by 0.075" - and then blow by about five times that - to about 1.5 inches. (From middle "C" on down, I added 0.025" punchings on the front rail every half-octave until I got to the bass where I added the three punchings to each front key pin - so that there was a transition to the shorter dip.) I have seen recommendations for increasing let-off to depower a pounder. I have never tried that though. Just curious whether anyone has any experience with the technique I outlined above, and how much dip/blow reduction is best to adequately depower the piano, but not aggravate the player too much. The amount I used what just a wild guess on my part. Terry Farrell ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/a9/ab/dd/e4/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC