Terry, May I second the opinion that you *will* get a better result by having the strings duplicated. You might consider it an exercise in maintaining good mental health, too. In my opinion (even if it is a spinet!), universals are *not* fun--especially those heavy ones! Barbara Richmond, RPT trying to remember when it was I decided to live life without those things....... somewhere near Peoria, IL ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Love" <davidlovepianos@earthlink.net> To: "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 9:32 PM Subject: RE: univ. bass strings > Take off the broken strings and send them off for duplication. If the > strings are missing, take the measurements that your favorite string maker > requires and have them made. You will get a better result. > > David Love > davidlovepianos@earthlink.net > > > > [Original Message] > > From: pianolover 88 <pianolover88@hotmail.com> > > To: <pianotech@ptg.org> > > Date: 1/12/2004 7:13:06 PM > > Subject: univ. bass strings > > > > I'm replacing two single bass strings in a spinet. I plan to use > Universals > > and I'm wondering which of the Schaff partial sets would be the right > > choice. Number 2019, pg. 78 looks like a good choice, but then again, > number > > 2006 strings are the heaviest. I am assuming the #2019, which has more > > strings already contains these heaviest strings? > > > > I would appreciate any recommendations. Again this is for a SPINET and > the > > strings to be replaced are two single bass, immediately before the first > > bi-chords. > > > > Terry Peterson
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC