---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment On 14-mei-04, at 23:50, Topperpiano@aol.com wrote: > The study that you have noted using the three Abel, Renner, Imadegawa=20= > is interesting because as Andre just noted it really is a difference=20= > between the European and American style of hammer production.=A0 I = just=20 > mentally group the Abel, Renner and Imadegawa as virtually the same=20 > hammer manufacturing theory with their own twist applied - very=20 > different for the NY S&S approach.=A0 I do not agree Topperpiano, Imadegawa is totally different from Abel and Renner. Renner is totally different from Abel and Imadegawa. Abel is totally different from Imadegawa and Renner. They each use different felt and, due to their methods of making=20 hammers, the tonal outcome is really totally different too, their own=20 twist applied or not. The NY Steinway is a totally different matter indeed. I just want to make sure that you understand that the Japanese and the=20= two European hammer makers are worlds apart, and the two European=20 hammer makers as well. friendly greetings from Andr=E9 Oorebeek Amsterdam - The Netherlands 0031-20-6237357 0645-492389 0031-75-6226878 www.concertpianoservice.nl www.grandpiano.nl "where music is, no harm can be" ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/enriched Size: 1331 bytes Desc: not available Url : https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/ec/64/ac/ee/attachment.bin ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC