This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Ric, thank you very much for your statements about the pure 12th tuning... 15 years after its publication in euro piano 3/88 ("Stopper tuning - = Equally temepered scale based on pure dudecimos (12th, pure octave + = pure 5th) it seems to become accepted.=20 At the time i did the publication, most technicians called me crazy and = there were only a few who understood what my intention was. Isaac, maybe your opinion about the pure 12th may change if you hear this = tuning done by someone who is familiar with tuning it. I can not agree = that the 5ths are more strange than in normal tuning, since they are = less sharp than your preferred normal VT tuning. best regards, Bernhard Stopper for more information about the pure 12th tuning (in german): http://www.piano-stopper.de/html/stotun.htm ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Richard Brekne=20 To: oleg-i@noos.fr ; Pianotech=20 Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 11:05 PM Subject: Re: For your Listening Pleasure - tuning thoughts Issac.. I couldnt disagree more with you about the P 12ths tuning. The 12th = tunings curve results in a very condensed stretch which has the peculiar = effect of sounding as tho it has a greater stretch then its actual = stretch numbers would suggest. Typically the highest C is no more then = 28 cents stretched... which is about as slight a stretch as they come. I = can hardly see that a more conservative stretch is really possible = without creating narrow 2:1 octaves at some point.=20 In the temperament range, this tuning has fourths and fifths that are = nearly identical to the standard temperament. The distance between D3's = third and A4's fundamental is typically narrowed by 0.3 to 0.5 bps for = this range. Spread over the 17 notes of the 12th this is hardly = something the human ear can directly discern. A3's 2nd is placed such = that A3 has a comfortable 6:3 relationship with A4, whilst at the same = time maintaining an acceptable narrowness with D3's 3rd... typically = about 0.35 bps... also very very standard stuff. In fact... the only = real area of significant divergence from a standard tuning scheme is = found in the area around A5- E6 in which octave based tuning curves = usually display a temporal shift in direction for the resulting 12ths. = The P 12ths tuning results in the most singing and warm treble I have = ever heard from a tuning... as long as one is careful not to allow any = error on the wide side of just 12ths. This is because of the natural = warmness of pure intervals, and because of the resulting calm of the = double and triple octaves this yields. But beyond the warmth this = creates the constancy in major 10ths and 17ths that also results, and = the increased sustain times resulting from frequent incidence of pure = coinciding partials in the octaves AND 12ths contributes to a clarity in = addition to the warmth this tuning imparts. If you have had strange resulting 5ths from attempting an aural = implementation of this tuning... then you have not succeeded in tuning = it precisely enough I would guess, as one of the most pleasing results = of this tuning is the resulting 5ths. Jim Coleman mentioned this in a = private note to me, along with his opinion that resulting octaves in the = fore mentioned range (A5 - E6) were particular illy pleasing. Reading through the rest of your comments... it seems to me that you = havent really understood what the P 12ths tuning is all about... as in = several spots you allude to a high stretch factor that simply does not = exist in such a tuning. Anyone tuning double octaves that are wide = enough to begin to silence triple octaves is contriving a tense and = piercing tuning indeed, which goes tonally in the opposite direction of = the warmth you indicate below. Not that there are not uses for this = approach mind you. I havent had opportunity to tune with the VT yet, so I will certainly = reserve comment as to the nature of its standard tuning. Tho I imagine = it to be a fine ETD. =20 And by the way.... I personally thought the violinist was from time to = time a bit less then on top of his game intonation wise. What you deemed = as fourths slightly smaller then the pianos... I deemed as just plain = flat, at least at several instances sitting in the concert hall. And I = wasnt the only one judging from the discussion afterwards. Perhaps = understandable since he was suffering from a very bad cold. Cheers RicB Isaac OLEG wrote: ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/cd/ba/5a/68/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC