This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment I'm referring to discussions last year where it was argued that it was impossible for wood as a material to support an arch, because of cellular-level crushing ("compression set"). I believe the counter to = this demonstration was to show how little pressure was required to push down = on the arch and collapse it. Therefore the wood alone wouldn't be strong enough to support string downbearing (for example, the soundboard = compressed by the rim, without any ribs). I don't mean to resurrect the prior argument, but just as in any = profession, it's difficult for a student like me to try to figure out what "best practices" are. --Cy-- ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Avery Todd" <avery@ev1.net> To: "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 7:56 PM Subject: Re: Practical Concert Work > Cy, > > Admitedley, I haven't read the article yet but I don't understand what this > means. > > Avery > > >The M & H factory tour article mentions that the factory technician = did the > >old demo of a business card's extra thickness forming an arch in a = length of > >spruce... > > > >--Cy Shuster-- > >Bluefield, WV > > _______________________________________________ > pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/79/10/23/8b/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC