This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
Does anyone call their clients the night before? I never used to, and, =
in fact, despise the practice in priciple. I just don't like the =
thought that I'm enabling people to not have to keep track of their =
appointments. However, I'm more OK with enabling than I am with lost =
income. I call every night to confirm tomorrows appointments, and since =
I started, zero no-shows. Never fails, BTW, the one time I don't call, =
it's a no-show.
William R. Monroe
Madison, WI
Assoc.
----- Original Message -----=20
From: richard.ucci@att.net=20
To: Pianotech=20
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 7:51 AM
Subject: Re: Customer ethics--no more extras!
Ron,
As one who has hade a rash of no shows this last summer, I know what a =
tough position it puts us in. I already told a client who had an obvious =
disregard for the value of my time to find another tuner.=20
Others I don't call back and wait to see how long it takes for them to =
finally contact me.
I would consider telling them that there is a missed appointment fee =
of half what you charge and make it sound like it is the dealer who is =
getting the money.
Rick Ucci/Ucci Piano
-------------- Original message from Ron Nossaman : --------------=20
>=20
> >I am more frustrated with customers than I am with the dealers. I =
usually=20
> >charge the dealer something if my appointment goes into overtime, =
but I=20
> >always give them a good deal. I have good relationships with =
them, and it=20
> >has paid off. Lack of customer loyalty is my gripe here. MOst of =
the=20
> >people who do the "free" tunings here do little more than that, =
and often=20
> >don't even do a necessary pitch adjustment. I have always tried =
to make=20
> >sure the customer is well taken care of, and as Mr. Bullock said, =
it is=20
> >usually not recognized.=20
> >=20
> >Thanks for the input,=20
> >=20
> >Dave S.=20
>=20
> Dave,=20
> At the risk of aggravating the situation, I'd like! to offer an =
observation.=20
> I really - REALLY - dislike the concept and use of the term "free" =
tuning.=20
> The implication (because of the word "free"), and resulting =
practice, is=20
> that since it is "free" there's no penalty for being unavailable =
at the=20
> time of the appointment. The assumption being that the tuner is =
paid by the=20
> dealer whether he does any work or not (as is apparently the case =
in the=20
> situation between the customer and their employer), and nobody =
pays a=20
> penalty for a no-show. Far and away, the worst record for folks =
standing me=20
> up on a scheduled appointment are for dealer tunings. That leaves =
me in a=20
> position to decide who eats the income loss. By all that's right =
and=20
> proper, it ought to be the twit customer who couldn't be bothered =
to meet=20
> their commitment to someone else's time and livelihood, but they =
don't see=20
> it that way because the tuning was "free". The d! ealer, =
rightfully,=20
> shouldn't be liable for the service call for obvious reasons, nor =
is he=20
> going to be amused if I monetarily penalize the twit customer for =
wasting=20
> my means of eating. So I get a choice. I either offend the dealer, =
offend=20
> the customer and the dealer, or take my shafting quietly without =
raising a=20
> disturbance. I'll get the shafting in any case, but I get the =
luxury of=20
> determining what sort of disturbance I'll cause en-route. A =
dubious benefit=20
> at best...=20
>=20
> Ron N=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________=20
> pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/47/d5/0c/f6/attachment.htm
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC