string termination

[Ron Nossaman]

> Ron O. and Ron N.,
> 
> You both think that the Stuart agraffe doesn't make a better 
> termination? I would think it does, because it is a harder surface than 
> a conventional bridgepin+wood termination, and would thus be somewhat 
> less flexible, causing less energy (high freq. especially) to be lost.
> No doubt that the agraffe's mass can also contribute.
> 
> Calin Tantareanu


Did either of us say anything one way or another about the quality 
of termination of Stuart's agraffe?

Ron N