---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Avery - There's been a lot of discussion of the material over the last week or so, although under a number of thread subjects. The following is one from me: >First, it seems that Escaine or Ecsaine is what we were using back then, >apparently erroneously. Spelling-wise, Ecsaine seems correct, as the >product produced by the Toray Industry of Japan. Escaine appears to be >the "Nucular" of the textile industry, since doing a search on the term >brings up many pages of reference to its use in Lexus vehicles, but >absolutely nothing on the material itself. Someone can perhaps give a more definitive response, however, it appears that, not only were we spelling it wrong, back then, but it wasn't even ecsaine we were dealing with, but Corfam. I have to check again, as someone, possibly Ron or Del said that the formula was changed, at some point, creating the problem. If I find the post, I'll forward it. David Skolnik At 04:22 PM 7/4/2005 -0500, you wrote: >Can we please agree on the spelling????? I "thought" it was Escaine! Am I >wrong? > >Avery > > >>Good to see you again too. Do play with that Ecsaine for a while. Try to >>hurt it, or find something wrong with it, and get back with your >>impressions. I think it's pretty uptown stuph. >>Ron N >> >>_______________________________________________ >>pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives > >_______________________________________________ >pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/b3/a6/10/f3/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC