Hi Ron N, Dale and all, Ron O wrote: >>Indeed, when we added rib extensions (which significantly increased >>the overall rib height) to the 1968 CF Yamaha we rebuilt recently, >>the increase in sustain in the first capo section was most >>noticeable. Strangely enough, it seemed to have improved power >>also. I can only put this down to the possibility that the >>stiffer/heavier panel had improved efficiency relative to the >>standard item. Theoretically, if the sustain is increased, the >>power at the first part of tonal development should decrease. Ron N wrote: >I've noticed this too. My current thinking is that the dieing of >tone in the middle of the envelope is more noticeable than the high >volume in the attack. A lower attack volume, and a higher middle >volume is perceived as a more powerful tone. At least that's >Thursday's take. We tend to evaluate impressions of the total, >rather than to break it down chronologically. Yes, that's been my own interpretation also. I agree that our brains tend to average stuff out. For those of you who are interested, I recently received a sneak preview of the D that Ron N's remanufacturing at the moment (with a sound board panel made by our list's very own Terry Farrell). I eagerly await the proof of the pudding, with this major project that Ron is undertaking. I suspect a very nice result coming right up. Its all most interesting stuff. Ron O> -- OVERS PIANOS - SYDNEY Grand piano manufacturers ________________________ Web: http://www.overspianos.com.au Email: mailto:ron@overspianos.com.au ________________________
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC