This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment As always, Dale and David, thanks for your insight. =20 I understand the hammer weight thing. Let me add that this rebuilder = found that the 17 mm provided a bit too much leverage for most projects = and wished New York produced a shank with a 16.5 mm distance. By any chance (though I know there are always exceptions) would 16.5 = tend to work better in the earlier S&S pianos?=20 =20 Are Ronsen Wurzen hammers generally lighter than NY S&S? Thanks, Barbara Richmond ----- Original Message -----=20 From: David Love=20 To: 'Pianotech'=20 Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 12:48 PM Subject: RE: knuckle size/ knuckle mounting distance =20 =20 =20 I would use Renner knuckles. The size will depend on the location. = The farther down the balancier, the bigger they tend to be. Choice of = 16.5 over 17 should depend on the overall leverage as it relates to the = hammer weight, not a personal preference. =20 =20 David Love davidlovepianos@comcast.net=20 -----Original Message----- From: pianotech-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces@ptg.org] On = Behalf Of Barbara Richmond Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 8:12 AM To: Pianotech Subject: knuckle size/ knuckle mounting distance =20 Hey Dale Erwin (and all), =20 Long time ago we were talking about moving/replacing knuckles. I'm = ready--um.... well, I have a friend who has all the equipment, anyway. = ;-) =20 =20 So, I'm ready to order knuckles. One time you recommended the ones by = Tokiwa. I looked in the Pianotek catalog and saw that the Tokiwa = knuckles only come in 10mm diameter. I guess you wouldn't use them if = it was a problem, but have you ever run into a case where that size just = won't work regulation wise? =20 =20 I have a couple sets of shanks and flanges downstairs and I haven't = measured their width yet, so maybe I'm jumping the gun. Perhaps I = should just wait until I have the pianos in hand and can test different = shanks & knuckles. =20 I also had a private e-mail from someone who said he doesn't like 17 = mm knuckle distance, but prefers 16.5. After using the 17 mm knuckle = distance on the Big, dead hall D and having to set the key dip pretty = deep (but no complaints from pianists), I am wondering if 16.5 mm = distance and a bigger knuckle (or not) would be better than 17 mm. =20 =20 The pianos that will probably get these sets of shanks and flanges are = 1920s (or give or take a few years) Steinways. One B and the other an = L. I'd like to just have these sets ready and waiting for convenience = sake and also, because my friend with the equipment is available now. =20 =20 What would you do? =20 Thanks, =20 Barbara Richmond ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/0c/63/39/01/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC