Hi again Ed, and whomever else. What I am curious about is the how the whole piano system impedance is put together. More specifically whether a soft rimmed piano can compensate for the rims tendancy to absorb energy by employing other system impedance devices... for example a heavier plate. I mean... there is always a tradeoff it seems. Either in power/sustain or in other ways... the overall tone colour etc. I dont think anyone would dispute that Bøsendorfers are right up there with the best of them. So one has to assume they have reasoned through the pros and cons of such choices. Why would they choose a softer rim if the result was bound to be a significanly less powerfull instrument ? I guess that what I am after.... how they must have felt they were able to compensate for the soft rim. I mean.. on the one hand you have the string scale which needs a good impedance match with a soundboard. To some degree this seems a bit independant (from what I think I've understood through the years) of the impedance of the rest of the piano to the soundboard... yet not totally so. You took the rubber rim example... lets go the other way around.... what if you could create a rim/plate condition with absolute impedance to the soundboard ? Totally eliminate any sound production/contribution/or whatever you want to call it from the case and plate ? I'm far from convinced at this point that such an instrument would sound any good at all... but hey... maybe I'm wrong :) btw.. I service a brand new 225 Bosie. There is no way I could think of this thing as lacking any power. Ok... its in a smaller room, but then I've been at pianos for long enough to hear through and make a good judgement as to how the thing would do in a concert hall. It do just as well as any C I've ever heard me thinks. Cheers RicB
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC