With the exception of note 16 (not sure what's going on there), I don't see any real problem here. Even if you were you to reweigh down to 37 or 38 grams, you are comfortably under FW maximums (as outlined by Stanwood charts). You do have some room to add weight especially if you wanted to push up the balance weight a little. An R of 5.6 or 5.7 is a reasonable target, in my view, for good regulation specs--check and see though. If you smooth out the strike weights in the basic range that your hammers seem to be falling and set up the front weights accordingly aiming for a uniform balance weight, you should be fine. I would double check the measurements on #16. My guess is that there is some measurement error. Trying to get perfectly uniform R numbers is generally not possible depending on things like uniform knuckle hanging, straight capstan line and capstan line parallel to the balance rail line (which it appears you may not have), not to mention elimination of measurement error (always a factor). If the current hammers produce a tone that you like with the current weight, why would you change hammers? If you want to experiment with weight, you can always use the binder clip method--removeable too! David Love davidlovepianos at comcast.net www.davidlovepianos.com
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC