Hi Ron Thanks for both your replies on this thread. This bit below clears up a couple points for me. Yes,,, makes perfect sense. Easy to overlook things indeed.... :) The point that the single and double loops will effect downbearing changes about the same relative to the English (what we call the French) loop (twisted) has to do with the coil around the wire and not the loop itself I suppose. I would still some more clarification as to reasonings back and forth about which configuation seems to yield the best movement for the back scale. On the one hand, the greater length of non-twisted string would seem to be of benifit... but on the other hand... the twisted English loop on a vertical hitch pin would seem to compensate for the twisted wire by nature of the connection to the hitch pin. More detail when you and others get time. Cheers... soon time to settle in for our various ways of enjoying Christmas eve and Day. I know for my part that at least some of the good thoughts I will have in the next couple days will be for all of you on this list. RicB Notice also that while the back scale wire segment will be raised slightly, reducing the downbearing relative to an English twisted eye, a double looped eye such as the one shown above won't reduce the downbearing any more than will the single looped eye. I recall someone mentioning this as a problem with using the looped eye in pianos which were set up for English eyes. When building a piano from scratch, or when the bridges are being recapped or replaced this isn't a problem. But certainly, it should be given consideration when setting the downbearing on instruments where the original bridge is being retained without lowering the plate. Hope that makes sense. Ron O. -- OVERS PIANOS - SYDNEY Grand Piano Manufacturers
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC