Well, you did a great job cleaning it! One thing I noticed (but am not too sure about) is the painted over screws. I know newer Steinways (at least the bigger ones) have plated screws rather than painted screws. Might that be a clue to it's age or rebuildedness? JF On 4/20/07, Barbara Richmond <piano57 at insightbb.com> wrote: > Yes...well, I cleaned it. :-) --though it looks like I missed a crumb or > something. > > It's interesting what tales get told about pianos. I feel like I'm playing > one of those games when there's a string of people and the first one > "whispers a secret" to the next person. It's almost always funny to see how > the "secret" has changed by the time it gets to the last person. > > br > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Formsma" <formsma at gmail.com> > To: "Pianotech List" <pianotech at ptg.org> > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 9:10 PM > Subject: Re: marks on plate > > > >I think Patrick is correct. Also, there is no visible dust around the > > tuning pins...which would be a first to not have any dust in a piano > > that old. :-) > > > > JF > > > > On 4/19/07, J Patrick Draine <jpdraine at gmail.com> wrote: > >> To my eye that doesn't look like an original finish on that plate -- > >> and the understring felt appears a bit too bright a red for something > >> that's might have been collecting dust for 67 years. I'm betting those > >> tuning pins are a little fat too ... > >> Patrick > >> > >> On 4/19/07, Barbara Richmond <piano57 at insightbb.com> wrote: > >> > The owner told me the piano was all original, at least that is > >> > what she was told when she bought it from a dealer. > >> > > > >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC