I don't know if anyone other than me finds this interesting, but I thought I'd report on the findings of my diggings: like a dog with a bone, I couldn't rest with uncertainty, and so decided to take the question about how my 1927 Steinway M ended up cast incorrectly as a model O on the plate (discussed in a recent thread) right to the source, the Hamburg factory. I described the piano and its confusing model designation to Ulrich Erhard of C & A at Steinway London, who said he had never heard of this phenomenon. He straightaway called the Hamburg factory to inquire about it, and was told that they had indeed miscast a number of these pianos; the entire plate pattern must have been carved with the wrong letter designation, and multiple piano plates produced from it. It's interesting to consider the various scenarios of how this might have happened, but my favorite is the one my wife imagines; a usually skilled and reliable pattern maker had the pattern almost finished, went to lunch, had one pale ale too much, returned, and merrily carved an O into the pattern instead of M. Nobody caught the mistake (maybe it had lost it's identifying paperwork), and the rest is history. I suppose it's not that unlikely an occurrence. Haven't we all learned half of what we know through having done it wrong once or twice? This is a bit epic, though, having your mistake cast in iron. 249150 (serial # of Conrad Hoffsomer's piano with this "problem") minus 248042 (my piano's #) = 1,108 (!). I guess we can assume that there are quite a few of these pianos out there. Here's to the charms of human error, Allen Wright, RPT -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20070222/29d9fa69/attachment.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC