Hi JD, I just caught on this is an upright which makes it more difficult, my previous posts were assuming you were working on a grand. Sorry, sounds like your on the right track. Do post some photos, if possible, of your exercise. Fenton ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Delacour" <JD at Pianomaker.co.uk> To: "Pianotech List" <pianotech at ptg.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 2:03 PM Subject: Re: Plugging and redrilling an action rail > At 14:19 -0600 29/1/08, Mike Spalding wrote: > >>I'm trying to picture the situation, but need more info. How's the >>butt-to-jack alignment? If it's good now, what will you do after moving >>the butts over?... > > Well I did say about 50 holes -- easily missed!, and that means that of > course I need to re-drill for the levers and the dampers too. It's not a > job you can just wade into. > >> How about action height or shank length? Coincidentally, your hammer >> position error tapers to zero over the same range that string angle >> tapers to zero. Coincidence, or clue? Got a photo? > > A pertinent question indeed, but to bring hammer 28 (steel) into line with > the string would necessitate a shank about 3" long, since the original > holes are to the left of where they should be and the strike line is OK. > > I'll take pictures in due course because it's an interesting exercise. > I'll also describe the process of fitting new shanks and hammers to an > upright using the factory method and also using my hammer jig, which dies > uprights as well as grands. > > JD > > >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC