Jude Reveley/Absolute Piano wrote: > *Overall Length=100mm; Speaking Length=60mm; Backscale=40mm; Offset from > staight plain=10mm* > ** > According to my calculations this would yield a bearing angle of 23.5 > degrees with 9.5 at the front and 14 at the back. What I don't like is > that in this traditional model, the length between the front and rear > bridge pins is not accounted for but would certainly increase our rear > and thus composite bearing angle. This seems somewhat significant since > we base our calculation of the force on the bridge using this angle. Yes, if I were putting 23.5° net bearing on a piano bridge, this would certainly concern me. Since I'm usually putting on closer to 1° of bearing, and since the angle discrepancy from not taking the bridge top segment into account will likely be under 0.1°, and since I'm unlikely to be able to get within that range with the final product, or be able to accurately measure it if I did, I leave that hair unsplit. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC