[pianotech] Aural vs. ETD

Jeff Deutschle oaronshoulder at gmail.com
Fri Apr 3 11:38:20 PDT 2009


Right!!!

If people wanted accuracy there would only be photographs, not paintings.

On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 1:55 PM, David Boyce <David at piano.plus.com> wrote:
>>I wonder which is the most accurate.
>
> Well, what is the definition of accuracy?
>
> Capleton's book on tuning goes into that kind of thing on a rather
> philosophical level.  "Accuracy" is rather a nebulous concept. It might be
> better to talk of sweetness, beauty, wholeness, excitement, rather than
> accuracy. Even then, of course, it doesn't come down to one or the other.
> There are aural tuners who tune wonderfully and those who tune less than
> wonderfully, and ditto for users of ETDs.
>
> As Ron said a while ago in another discussion, "No tuning is ever really
> finished, just left behind". I like that!
>
> There is also my own metaphor for tuning which I rather like (he noted
> modestly, eyes fetchingly downcast and shuffling feet) "Part arithmetic and
> part flower-arranging".
>
> Best regards,
>
> David.
>



-- 
Regards,
Jeff Deutschle

Please address replies to the List. Do not E-mail me privately. Thank You.



More information about the pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC