[pianotech] ETD suggestions

[Avery Todd]

I used an SAT III for years while I was still at the university. I loved the
battery life! But I now have a Verituner that i really like.  (I had to
leave the SAT III since the univ. had paid for it!) And if you don't use the
back up lights too much, the battery lasts pretty well! If I had to buy
another one, I'd probably go with the SAT!

On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 11:38 PM, pmc033 at earthlink.net
<pmc033 at earthlink.net>wrote:

>  I also prefer the SAT.  The LED array is easy to see in almost any light,
> and gives an instant indication of sharpness or flatness.  I secretly wish
> the other options would incorporate that LED display.  You don't need to
> "upgrade", and spend a bunch of money every so often, as you do with
> software based ETD's.  Rugged isn't the word.  SAT is BULLETPROOF.  I have
> the same SAT 1 that I got 22 years ago.  I had it refurbished a few years
> ago with new battery and membrane switches.  It works and looks like new.
> I've dropped it more times than I can count.  Weeks of battery life between
> recharging.  The new SAT IV is even more customizable than before because it
> is more software-based, and can be user-upgraded via the internet.  I am not
> knocking any ot the other fabulous PPC or Smartphone software program
> options.  It's jus that I am used to the LED's and I prefer it over the
> others.
> I know a very reputable tech who uses a Peterson digital strobe tuner, but
> I wouldn't recommend it unless you are an experienced aural tuner.  It isn't
> in the same league with the rest of the all-digital units.
> If I were to make a recommendation, I'd say go to Grand Rapids this summer
> and try as many as you can get your hands on.  If you like a software
> program rather than a hardwired unit, go for it.  There are pros and cons
> either way.
>
> Paul McCloud
> San Diego
>
>
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* <wimblees at aol.com>
> *To: *pianotech at ptg.org
>  *Sent:* 04/04/2009 6:56:10 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [pianotech] ETD suggestions
>
>  My personal preference is the SATIII, primarily because it is it's own
> machine. Verituer is the same. A dedicated tool for a specific purpose. I'm
> not saying there is anything wrong with an RCT, (I have not worked with a
> Tunelab), but the battery life itself on a SAT is so much longer than the
> other models, that it really does make it a lot more convenient.
>
> Just my own preference.
>
> Willem (Wim) Blees, RPT
> Piano Tuner/Technician
> Mililani, Oahu, HI
> 808-349-2943
> Author of:
> The Business of Piano Tuning
> available from Potter Press
> www.pianotuning.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob McCall <rob at mccallpiano.com>
> To: pianotech at ptg.org
> Sent: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 10:37 am
> Subject: [pianotech] ETD suggestions
>
> I hope I'm not opening up a large can of worms here (yet somehow I feel I
> am) but I'd like to know what sort of ETD device or software is recommended
> and the reasons for your preference.
>
> I'm learning to tune aurally because I think it's vitally important to have
> that as a skill set. I'm thoroughly enjoying the process, as well.
>
> After reading many of your posts on the aural vs. ETD topic, I realize the
> importance of having an ETD, as well. I'm somewhat of a geek when it comes
> to technology, too!
>
> So... Pros and cons of what you use? CyberTuner, Tunelab, Sanderson
> Accu-tuner, Peterson Auto-Strobe... Others?
>
> I use a Mac, and I refuse to get a PC :-) so any PC only option is out for
> me, but others might find the information helpful.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Rob McCall
> Murrieta, CA
>
>
> ------------------------------
> E-file your IRS taxes *FREE* with TaxACT & have your refund in as few as 8
> days.<http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221430863x1201433849/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fwww.taxact.com%2F08tax.asp%3Fsc%3D084102950002%26p%3D82>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech_ptg.org/attachments/20090405/2a12d734/attachment-0001.html>