wimblees at aol.com wrote: This is a seminar's worth all by itself. > Those of you who think it is worth restoring old uprights, when you > evaluate them, do you consider the condition of the soundboard? If you don't then you're not doing your bloody job, are you? >Is it > worth it, to replace it, or do you just shim and refinish it? > > Wim Worth it? To whom? If it needs replaced, which it almost certainly does, is the resulting expectation of performance worth the cost to the owner? If it's not, is the income for the "rebuilder" worth putting a shim, refinish, and stringing on a trash soundboard a fair trade for whatever professional standards he may secretly, and conditionally, harbor? It depends on the rebuilder, doesn't it, and the availability of more honorable sources of income, DOESN'T IT? Realistically? "Will do ANYTHING for a buck" means just that, whatever it entails. All peripheral fallout is emotionally (glandularly) justified by the NEED. "Standards" are a more tenuous and negotiable concept, requiring reconciliation of "ethics" with socioeconomic circumstance. Since "ethics" is an artificial judgment condensed from and predicated by currently prevailing socioeconomic circumstance, rather than any sort of absolute, it's functionally meaningless outside of a defined set of universally agreed upon "rules". Unfortunately, lacking such lick and stick mindless rules, all this requires a tech who actually has some remote clue what the HELL he's talking about, the skill set and experience to realistically evaluate what he's looking at, and the gonads to do what he thinks is right, even (horrors) at the cost of his short term income potential. There's more, but if this doesn't say it, the rest is scree. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC