[pianotech] Aurally pure octaves

Jeff Deutschle oaronshoulder at gmail.com
Wed Apr 15 10:08:17 PDT 2009


Mr. Stopper:

Thank you for the reply.

I did as you suggested a while ago. I heard the 3:1 partial match so
strongly that it was the only “sweet spot” I could find, and really
only ended up with a beatless twelfth tuning. And to construct the
temperament I had to estimate the fifths and octaves until there where
enough other intervals to establish an equal temperament. Trying to
find a “sweet spot” for a fourth or fifth within or without a twelfth
always resulted in the interval being too pure for equal temperament,
even when playing three notes at once.

I will continue to wait for you to publish your method. I suspect that
the piece I am missing is making the beat of certain fourths and
fifths and 2:1 octaves be nearly integrals (such as 3 beats of one
interval for every 2 beats of another interval) while the 12ths become
slightly wide, but nearly pure. How close to perfect integrals and how
nearly pure would of course depend on the piano’s iH.


On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Bernhard Stopper <b98tu at t-online.de> wrote:
> Use a duodecime spanner tool and tune this duodecime (or twelfth) interval
> aurally pure with the vintage "whole tone" technique used for aurally pure
> octaves so far.
> And forget about tuning one specific partial pair of the octaves pure. They
> are different on every piano and on each position and absolutely meaningless
> in this tuning concept.
>
>
> Bernhard Stopper
>
>
> Am 15.04.2009 um 18:25 schrieb Jeff Deutschle:
>
>> Ed:
>>
>> Thank you for the reply.
>>
>> I know the 3:1 test that you mention and also a 6:2 test for beatless
>> 12ths, but Mr. Stopper has repeated many times that his 12ths are not
>> beatless but at a “sweet spot”. I am hoping to learn what the aural
>> tests for this “sweet spot” are.
>>
>> I’ve been playing with octaves that have equal beating 4:2 and 6:3
>> partials which result in an inherent 2:1 beat; meaning that the iH of
>> the piano inherently requires a certain beat rate of the wide 2:1
>> partials when the wide 4:2 partials beat at the same speed as the
>> narrow 6:3 partials. My biggest problem is that I tune few pianos that
>> have a clear enough tone to ghost the partials (the RBI tests aren’t
>> accurate enough for this) and have a pinblock capable of a very fine
>> tuning. If I like the sound, I hope to be able to hear it directly and
>> tune it without ghosting or first finding this inherent beat rate
>> first by ghosting. Of course this inherent beat rate will not be the
>> same for all octaves.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Ed  Sutton <ed440 at mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Who can question words like "Pure" and "Natural?"
>>> ["I tune impure octaves by listening to unnatural beats."]
>>>
>>> I'd like a simple, carefully crafted demonstration where several people
>>> tune
>>> their favorite octaves on a variety of pianos (A2-A3-A4-A5), and we
>>> record
>>> and measure the tunings.
>>>
>>> Then we might find out something specific that we can name and reproduce.
>>>
>>> Ed S.
>>>
>>> Jeff-
>>> To check a pure 12th, use the use the M6-M17 test, thus, for example:
>>> F3-D4=F3-A5. The beat of the sixth is very clear, and the seventeen
>>> should
>>> beat the same.
>>> ES
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Deutschle"
>>> <oaronshoulder at gmail.com>
>>> To: <pianotech at ptg.org>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 7:33 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [pianotech] Aurally pure octaves
>>>
>>>
>>> Kent:
>>>
>>> What are the "associated aural checks" for PureTuner? I continue to
>>> wait for Mr. Stopper's explanation.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Kent Swafford <kswafford at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hey, this could be good. How about if you come in and do a tuning
>>>> concert?
>>>> (Don't know what piano we'll have.) And then as time allows I can break
>>>> out
>>>> 'PureTuner and its associated aural checks.
>>>>
>>>> I know I will learn much; I can't wait.
>>>>
>>>> Kent
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 14, 2009, at 6:42 PM, David Andersen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 14, 2009, at 3:05 PM, Kent Swafford wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I came away more convinced than ever that whole sound tunings and
>>>>>> OnlyPure Tuner tunings are chasing after the same muse. I must say at
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> point that I think whole sound tuners can learn much and bring more
>>>>>> reliable
>>>>>> results by incorporating 'PureTuner techniques.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Care to compare notes at Pianotech Live in Grand Rapids? 8^)
>>>>>
>>>>> Absolutamente, mi amigo. My mind is open and humbly excited to
>>>>> learn....
>>>>>
>>>>> DA
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Jeff Deutschle
>>>
>>> Please address replies to the List. Do not E-mail me privately. Thank
>>> You.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Jeff Deutschle
>>
>> Please address replies to the List. Do not E-mail me privately. Thank You.
>>
>
>
>



-- 
Regards,
Jeff Deutschle

Please address replies to the List. Do not E-mail me privately. Thank You.



More information about the pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC