Ron. I think this is exactly in line with what I said. I am very well acquainted with what the Verituner does and doesn't. Indeed, two months before its release I went on record complaining about the single partial approach and got snowed on by a few folks for thinking it was even possible to do a multi-partial ETD. It does not listen to the note to be tuned before deciding its target, which was central to the point I made about ETD's not being able (at present) to find any sweet spot. The other central moment is the degree of para inharmonicity at this level of accuracy. It needs to be taken into account to find any sweet spot....which implies direct comparison of both notes simultaneously.... at the very least. That is precisely what ear tuners... especially those disciples of Smith do that an ETD doesn't. Cheers RicB You may want to revisit your research into the Verituner. While not listening to the ENTIRE spectrum of at least two different notes, it does use the information from a good number of partials to make tuning target placement choices. Combined with a thoughtful use of the custom style function, the technician can dictate which two or more notes are to be compared when calculating the tuning for each specific note. I've advocated a two-pass tuning for a number of years to allow the machine to have all of the inharmonicity data during the fine tuning pass. The Verituner really is different from the rest in that respect. The result is NOT a smooth curve tuning at any single partial level. Ron Koval Chicagoland
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC