I suppose given the obvious pointer to the keys, most folks would get
that far and not bother looking further as one would expect to see more
of the same in anycase. Reasonable enough. What puzzles me is that with
such procedures there seems to be no real data of any kind which
indicates what degree of key stiffening is needed in any given type of
action.... yet folks go trudging on in and stiffen away seemingly
without further ado... good woodworking or not.
The obvious question is how does one ascertain when any given level of
key stiffness is mooted by the rest of the actions lack of "stiffness" ?
For that matter, we dont really know much about if and when a key
becomes <<too stiff>>. Folks more or less just see if they are bendable
to some degree they cant really explain how they arrived at, and just
start adding key material.
Misunderstand me correctly. I'm not saying that keys never need to be
stiffened.... but I do question the basis on which this is done or not.
Personally, I've never run into an instrument where this was anything
close to a <<must do>>
Cheers
RicB
What puzzles me is that you are able to tell the difference in this
case between a proper job and a botch, and yet, in the case of the
totally non-stellar eyes on the bass strings you brought up in the
last thread, after 40 years of experience with properly made eyes
you were unable to see that these were quite unacceptable in every
possible way.
JD
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC