>A bit. What in the world do cast in front duplex lengths have to do >with any of this If raising bridge height has a consequence of a higher string height then is the consequence of a lower bridge height a result of a curved string termination on the plate and lower string height in the high treble. I thought not addressing an even string height was to maintain the front duplex spec measurements/angle. Why not grind the v-bar to develop an even string height and raise the counter bearings to maintain counter bearing angle and duplex length (if so desired). Since it is purported that a taller bridge has an improved tonal effect and close tolerance action dimensional measurements contribute to an even action then it must be concluded that the cast-in front duplex is what Moses carried off the Mount cast-in stone and all else must be sacrificed. -- Regards, Jon Page -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech_ptg.org/attachments/20090325/691040b4/attachment.html>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC