[pianotech] Action Ratios

David Love davidlovepianos at comcast.net
Tue Jan 5 22:00:02 MST 2010


Thanks for that clarification and explanations, however, even with that the
numbers don't make sense.  Let's assume that the left side of the equation
produces an action ratio of 5.5-a fairly standard target.  Then if we look
at the right side of the equation and target a key dip of 10mm, say.  By
your analysis the denominator would be 7.5 (.75 x 10) making the numerator
39.7mm representing blow distance minus let-off???  That doesn't seem to
bear any resemblance to what one would expect from an action ratio of 5.5 in
practice.  Clearly the dip-aftertouch number is at issue but the assignment
of the AT number seems somewhat arbitrary in order to make the formula work.
What, then, is the point of the right side of the equation at all?

 

David Love

www.davidlovepianos.com

 

From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf
Of Nick Gravagne
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 8:24 PM
To: pianotech at ptg.org; joegarrett at earthlink.net
Subject: Re: [pianotech] Action Ratios

 

Any confusion with the formulas as shown in emails below exists with the
(key dip - aftertouch). You cannot arbitrarily assign a number of your
choosing to this value, although from a practical regulating standpoint this
is often done. The idea of the overall transmission (or action) ratio is
that the component ratio of (hammer travel - let off) to (key dip -
aftertouch) is that of the product of the (output levers) to that of the
(input levers). My studies assign input levers as effort arms and output
levers as resistance arms.

 

So, if we designate: 

 

W = (hammer travel - let off)

S = (key dip - aftertouch)

 

H = rear key lever arm resistance (key out)

Rs = whippen lever arm resistance (whippen out)

K = hammer lever long arm resistance (hammer out)

 

V = front key lever effort (key in)

Ra = whippen lever arm effort (whippen in)

N = hammer lever short arm effort (hammer in)

 

The relationship, then, of W / S should be that of the product of Resistance
Arms / Effort Arms. But note that S (key dip - aftertouch) implies a
calculated value, not an arbitrary one. In order to isolate S the formula
works out thus:

 

S = (product of Effort Arms times W) / (product of Resistance Arms)

 

Once the theoretical value of S is isolated; the Action ratio can be
calculated.

 

So, using some values from a Kawai action model:

 

W = 46 mm - 2 mm = 44 mm)

S = (10.5 - aftertouch)

 

H = 126             V = 245

Rs = 94             Ra = 67

K = 141             N = 18.25 (Jack to knuckle contact taken at half stroke)

 

S = (V x Ra x N x W) / (H x Rs x K) = (245 x 67 x 18.25 x 44) / (126 x 94 x
141) = 7.89 mm which is the theoretical key dip minus aftertouch. Thus
aftertouch = 2.61 mm. Said another way; dip prior to aftertouch is 75% of
the key stroke, while aftertouch accounts for the remaining 25%.

 

Given this, the ratio of W to S is equal to the ratio of lever arms thus: W
/ S = 44 / 7.89 = 5.58 and the ratio of the products of the RAs / EAs =
5.575. The ratios not only agree, but they define the Action Ratio at half
stroke.

 

Now, the so-called aftertouch value of 2.61 mm seems odd, but it is
important to realize that the measurement for this (if we can call it that)
begins the exact moment that the jack tender makes contact with the let-off
button in a well regulated action, and continues to the a solid bottom at
full key dip. In addition, if the aftertouch value is far off from the
theoretical remember that 

 

In any case, measurements aside, this is how the ratios interact. For more,
see Pfeiffer's The Piano Hammer pages 110 and 111. It is necessary to work
the formulas and read a few things between the lines as some of the info
references his other book The Piano Key and Whippen.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nick Gravagne, RPT

Piano Technicians Guild

Member Society Manufacturing Engineers

Voice Mail 928-476-4143

 

  _____  

From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf
Of David Love
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 3:48 PM
To: joegarrett at earthlink.net; pianotech at ptg.org
Subject: Re: [pianotech] Action Ratios

 

Has to do with where the energy comes from and goes just to be sure you're
being consistent with the ratio orientation.  Key in is the distance from
key front to balance rail, key out is balance rail to capstan contact;
wippen in is capstan to wippen center, out is wippen center to knuckle
contact point (balancier); shank in is flange center to knuckle contact and
out is knuckle to tip of hammer or shank hammer center line (I see it done
both ways and I'm not really sure why one over the other).  

 

David Love

www.davidlovepianos.com

 

From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf
Of Joseph Garrett
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 2:00 PM
To: pianotech
Subject: Re: [pianotech] Action Ratios

 

David Love submitted a formula: " 

(keyout/key in) x (wippen out/wippen in) x (shank out/shank in) = (blow

distance - letoff)/(key dip-aftertouch)"

 

David,

Please explain the Keyout/keyin, wippenin/wippenout and shankout/shankin
terms. Either I've been sleeping too much lately or those are terms I've
never encountered. (Probably the former.<G>

Regards,

Joe

 

 

Joe Garrett, R.P.T. (Oregon)

Captain, Tool Police

Squares R I

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech.php/attachments/20100105/18489695/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC