If that were the case, wouldn't a small strip of action cloth to build up
the wippen cushion achieve the same goal without having to change the
knuckle?
David Love
www.davidlovepianos.com
From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf
Of Ed Foote
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 4:35 AM
To: pianotech at ptg.org
Subject: Re: [pianotech] Action inertia FW versus SW
Once the stroke is initiated the action accelerates with not enough control
and the pianist gets a feeling of being disconnected from the keys. The
pianist feels that he loses control and a sense of weight through the
stroke. Also, because this fly-away issue controlling pianissimo playing is
difficult and must be done with the utmost caution in arm weight (I can tell
this myself as a player).
I would take a close look at the "magic line", and see if perhaps the
capstan contact patch is moving through the line very early. If so, you
have a decreasing action ration from almost the start. A larger knuckle
will move the crossing point lower, possibly restoring a bit of control on
ppp.
If capstan placment on the new keys is too close to the balance rail,
there may also be a slowing down of the action due to FW getting the upper
hand with the leverage.
Regards,
Ed Foote RPT
http://www.uk-piano.org/edfoote/index.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech.php/attachments/20100317/b41c9ffe/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC