3 hours? Wow, these were small picture files. I sent the originals through files at ptg.org expecting there to be links to the photos... Barbara Richmond, RPT near Peoria, Illinois ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jon Page" <jonpage at comcast.net> To: pianotech at ptg.org Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 6:26:06 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: Re: [pianotech] To many and too big pictures Re: [pianotech] To many and too big pictures Thought there was a limit of size and quantity of photos on this list and there was another place to wend pictures. For some of use that can only get dial up these last pictures held up my computer almost 3 hours. I can only get 28.8 on dial up. All the more reason to read the list via the archives. You don't have to d/l the attachment and you can read all the posts you want. Even better for dial-up because you can select the posts you want to read and not have to d/l everything else. http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech.php/2010-May/date.html#end I think the list should be read solely through the archive, that would save on bandwidth overall. Why do you 'need' to have instant priority delivery? Get with it - it's already online. The listing in the archive is instantaneous anyway, so the immediate dispersion to membership is wasted bandwidth. Not to mention filling up personal in-boxes. -- Regards, Jon Page -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech.php/attachments/20100519/e4160c7d/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC