Don't (buy) your reasoning. Just follow the rules or change them. Don't change the subject. Ron At 06:26 PM 5/19/2010, you wrote: >>Thought there was a limit of size and quantity of photos on this >>list and there was another place to wend pictures. >> >>For some of use that can only get dial up these last pictures held >>up my computer almost 3 hours. >>I can only get 28.8 on dial up. > >All the more reason to read the list via the archives. >You don't have to d/l the attachment and you can read all the >posts you want. Even better for dial-up because you can select >the posts you want to read and not have to d/l everything else. > >http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech.php/2010-May/date.html#end > >I think the list should be read solely through the archive, that >would save on bandwidth overall. Why do you 'need' to have >instant priority delivery? Get with it - it's already online. > >The listing in the archive is instantaneous anyway, so the >immediate dispersion to membership is wasted bandwidth. >Not to mention filling up personal in-boxes. > >-- > >Regards, > >Jon Page -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech.php/attachments/20100519/5bc3fc98/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC