On 2/2/2011 11:34 AM, David Love wrote: > I'll address both of these separate questions. > > First, (Mike) let's be clear, I didn't say that the first segment didn't > increase while the speaking length did, I said the first segment didn't > increase *above* the level where the speaking segment ends up. Quite right, I did misquote you. I apologize. So let me restate my question. You can demonstrate that the speaking length tension doesn't exceed it's final tension by listening to its pitch as it rises just to the target pitch. How do you know what the tension in the first segment is doing? Since you're increasing the speaking length tension by pulling the string across a v-bar and counterbearing, deductive reasoning would tell us that the tension in the first segment is equal to the speaking length tension PLUS the friction at the v-bar and counterbearing. Either the friction is zero, or the first segment tension is greater than the speaking length tension during a pitch increase. I've no doubt that you have found a technique which allows you to tune fast, accurate, and stable. And I applaud your willingness to share and teach. I'm only nit-picking because when your explanation appears to contradict the laws of physics, we're not getting an accurate picture of what your technique actually is. Mike
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC