[pianotech] Carbon Fiber Lever (was Hammer Technique: was Q & ARoundtable)

[Alan Eder]

Fujan's support has been excellent.  More over, when I pitched his lever to Fred Sturm (as a satisfied customer, receiving no compensation whatsoever), I mentioned that the Fujan is probably better than the knock-off, but even if it isn't, I would rather spend more in the interest of giving credit where credit is due.  If individuals (and even whole countries, nowadays!) decide to rip off the originators of great products, and we go for the one with the lower price point, what does that do to the motivation to make a better mouse trap?  THAT, my friends, is un-American.


Alan E.


-----Original Message-----
From: Mr. Mac's <tune-repair at allegiance.tv>
To: pianotech <pianotech at ptg.org>
Sent: Sun, Feb 6, 2011 4:56 am
Subject: Re: [pianotech] Carbon Fiber Lever (was Hammer Technique: was Q & ARoundtable)



On Feb 6, 2011, at 11:37 AM, Kurt Baxter wrote:

> … I am curious how Steve Fujan feels about the likes of: …

Kurt,

I know one thing about those likes that Steve Fujan
   most likely would never say, so I'll say it.

You will "never" get the support of the products from those links
   the way Steve Fujan will give you.

These comments I make are based solely on the personal and professional
   experience and interaction that I have had with the creator of
   The CarbonTube Piano Tuning Lever
   http://www.fujanproducts.com/

Performance and support is what I care about most
   when I lay on the line $$$$$.

Sincerely,

Keith McGavern

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech.php/attachments/20110206/0ab635b1/attachment.htm>