Hi, James
Don't fiddle around with trying to get it accurate -- return it to
Schaff with a note explaining that it isn't accurately tuned to 440.
On the other hand, what are "all electronic instruments"? I lot of
little tuning boxes for guitar, flute, etc., are quite far off. Have you
checked it against other forks? If you are testing it with amateur-level
electronic sources, you might try finding a tuner who uses an ETD
(electronic tuning device) and check it against that instead.
I've ordered a number of John Walker tuning forks (generally A=440) and
not had a bad one yet.
As for the room temperature and so on, my kit lives in the car, so the
fork is always cold. I warm it with my hands to somewhere near room
temperature, (which, please note, is a lot cooler than the human body).
Then I lay it down on the piano. I consider that what I'm getting for
A440 this way, is very, very close. ("Close enough to make no never
mind", as people used to say -- and, solely in my opinion, ought to say
more often!)
Of course for your tuning exam you want to be sure your pitch source is
accurate. I used my normal fork for mine, and got 100% (on THAT section,
<groan>). The large aluminum fork is pretty vulnerable to changing
temperatures. A Deagan-style fork might be a better choice. There's
nothing wrong with having two forks, either ...
Susan Kline
On 1/19/2011 8:04 AM, James Sasso wrote:
> Hello Everyone;
> I just bought a John Walker tuning fork from Schaff in preparation for
> my tuning exam. All electronic instruments indicate this fork is 6-8
> cents flat at room temperature. I'd like to get some feedback as to
> options. My other forks average average to within 2 cents of C5 and A4
> but the A4 one is aluminum. I was thinking of keeping and filing the
> John Walker fork, but wouldn't 6-8 cents require an awful lot of
> filing and mutilation of the fork? Another option would be to return
> the current one and ask Schaff to send one closer to A440. A final
> option I've considered is to purchase a Sanderson Accu-fork ($165
> Pianotek). Any comments would be appreciated.
> Thanks,
> Jim
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC