Hi, James Don't fiddle around with trying to get it accurate -- return it to Schaff with a note explaining that it isn't accurately tuned to 440. On the other hand, what are "all electronic instruments"? I lot of little tuning boxes for guitar, flute, etc., are quite far off. Have you checked it against other forks? If you are testing it with amateur-level electronic sources, you might try finding a tuner who uses an ETD (electronic tuning device) and check it against that instead. I've ordered a number of John Walker tuning forks (generally A=440) and not had a bad one yet. As for the room temperature and so on, my kit lives in the car, so the fork is always cold. I warm it with my hands to somewhere near room temperature, (which, please note, is a lot cooler than the human body). Then I lay it down on the piano. I consider that what I'm getting for A440 this way, is very, very close. ("Close enough to make no never mind", as people used to say -- and, solely in my opinion, ought to say more often!) Of course for your tuning exam you want to be sure your pitch source is accurate. I used my normal fork for mine, and got 100% (on THAT section, <groan>). The large aluminum fork is pretty vulnerable to changing temperatures. A Deagan-style fork might be a better choice. There's nothing wrong with having two forks, either ... Susan Kline On 1/19/2011 8:04 AM, James Sasso wrote: > Hello Everyone; > I just bought a John Walker tuning fork from Schaff in preparation for > my tuning exam. All electronic instruments indicate this fork is 6-8 > cents flat at room temperature. I'd like to get some feedback as to > options. My other forks average average to within 2 cents of C5 and A4 > but the A4 one is aluminum. I was thinking of keeping and filing the > John Walker fork, but wouldn't 6-8 cents require an awful lot of > filing and mutilation of the fork? Another option would be to return > the current one and ask Schaff to send one closer to A440. A final > option I've considered is to purchase a Sanderson Accu-fork ($165 > Pianotek). Any comments would be appreciated. > Thanks, > Jim
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC