[pianotech] A432 Tuning Fork

Shawn Hansen kayceemusic at gmail.com
Wed Jan 19 22:08:39 MST 2011


I use an aluminum fork, and it IS more susceptible to temperature changes
than a steel one.  I like it because it rings longer and I just plain got
used to it.  I calibrated mine to my body temperature and check it with a
technician who has an ETD every year or more.  I keep it in my pocket during
the day while I tune and then place it in my arm pit (outside of a tee
shirt) until it feels as warm or slightly warmer than my cheek right before
I tune A4.  Muting the piano is usually just the right amount of time to get
it up to temp.

I also have a John Walker for backup.

Good luck on your test!

Shawn

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:04 AM, James Sasso <jwsasso at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Everyone;
> I just bought a John Walker tuning fork from Schaff in preparation for my
> tuning exam. All electronic instruments indicate this fork is 6-8 cents flat
> at room temperature.  I'd like to get some feedback as to options. My other
> forks average average to within 2 cents of C5 and A4 but the A4 one is
> aluminum. I was thinking of keeping and filing the John Walker fork, but
> wouldn't 6-8 cents require an awful lot of filing and mutilation of the
> fork? Another option would be to return the current one and ask Schaff to
> send one closer to A440. A final option I've considered is to purchase a
> Sanderson Accu-fork ($165 Pianotek). Any comments would be appreciated.
> Thanks,
> Jim
>



-- 
Shawn Hansen RPT
certified piano technician
816.896.4047
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech.php/attachments/20110119/47ff2805/attachment.htm>


More information about the pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC