Excellent point, Ed, but it doesn't always win the argument. I was called back to a church where the music director was a retired school music teacher (I find they can be the worst. They think they know what they are talking about and everyone assumes they do). The complaint was the piano was horrible after 30 days. I went back (Yamaha P22 w/ full DChaser) and it was pretty dead on, definitely NOT horrible. I retuned the piano at no charge. Got another call back. This time I insisted that the complainer be present when I got to the church. When I asked him to show me what he was having trouble with I knew I was probably in trouble: no octave test, no chord test, he played individual notes chromatically down the scale until he got into the upper second octave or so. "Hear that? It isn't right." No, I didn't hear anything. Unisons were good. I then tested and octaves were good, intervals were good. I got out the Pocket PC w/Tune-Lab. It showed the notes on pitch which I showed him. I then demonstrated, deliberately detuning octaves, then retuning aurally so he could hear it come into tune, and then showed by the Tune Lab that it actually was in tune. He didn't seem overly convinced. Then he asked me to detune the tenor notes by 5 cents or so because his bass singers were having trouble getting their pitches. At that point I understood that this man had no clue. I said I couldn't do that as politely as I could, buttoned up the piano, gathered my tools and left. I did lose that account but I can't worry about it. Former RCT user here (I even have an uninstalled full version sitting on the shelf). I love my Tune Lab. The analog graph at the bottom is the sweetest thing for helping with unisons in octaves 6 and 7. And it makes pitch raises of more than 75 cents a snap, no mutes needed. Tune Lab costs half the price, doesn't have the odious protection key, has the superior feature of the analog graph, makes pitch raises easier, is nicer to use in the extreme treble. It is a little more difficult to use initially, but you can download a fully functional demo to help you get started. Dean Dean W May (812) 235-5272 PianoRebuilders.com (888) DEAN-MAY Terre Haute IN 47802 _____ From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Ed Foote Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 10:00 AM To: pianotech at ptg.org Subject: Re: [pianotech] "Repeatable" tuning >>Although I do sympathize with Ed Foote's mention of recording studios needing to have things the same. That instance, however, is a very limited instance in the scope of the rest of the musical world; therefore, we shouldn't let that dictate how we should measure repeatability. (Not that Ed is doing that -- I understand where he is coming from.) Greetings, There is more. If anybody has noticed, string players can get real defensive when the subject of intonation comes up. Last month, a violinist, (arching eyebrows and all), asked me if the piano was exactly the same as it was during the earlier practice session. I said yes. She asked, "Exactly?". I took out the SAT, set it to B6, hit the note, and watched the lights stop. I told her it was within .1 cent of where it had been,( I know, I know, a little bit of a fudge in the theoretical world), and she had no problem accepting that her perception might have changed,(which I know is plausible). If I told her that it sounded the same to me, I don't think it would have been as convincing, since that puts the discussion on a "Who's ears and memory is better"? These machines have value in numerous directions. Regards, Ed Foote RPT -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech.php/attachments/20110128/9eca2b85/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC