[pianotech] the big discussion

[David Love]

He may be but I think for the purposes of this contest he used the machine as his primary guide, if I'm not mistaken.
David Love
www.davidlovepianos.com
(sent from bb)

-----Original Message-----
From: Susan Kline <skline at peak.org>
Sender: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:47:23 
To: <pianotech at ptg.org>
Reply-To: pianotech at ptg.org
Subject: Re: [pianotech] the big discussion

On 1/31/2011 7:33 AM, David Love wrote:
> I think you missed it.  It was mentioned several times and you are correct,
> the consensus was that there was no discernable difference.
On the other hand, it was pointed out that Jim Coleman, Sr. is an 
accomplished aural tuner without any ETD, so the contest was between a 
purely aural tuner and what people started to call a "hybrid" tuner.

Susan

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech.php/attachments/20110131/46b32abb/attachment.htm>