[pianotech] Horse and buggy users.

tnrwim at aol.com tnrwim at aol.com
Wed Jul 20 11:39:41 MDT 2011




who gives a rats arse 
bout the home office 

William,

Wrong again - I DO CARE.



Say what?  







-----Original Message-----
From: Duaine Hechler <dahechler at att.net>
To: pianotech <pianotech at ptg.org>
Sent: Wed, Jul 20, 2011 7:25 am
Subject: Re: [pianotech] Horse and buggy users.


William,
Wrong again - I DO CARE.
However, as I am listening to the audio posted, it appears that it was NOT 
ested thoroughly - especially the tech list 
ortion.
And, the tech list portion was NOT taken seriously enough to be one of the 
RIMARY functions that WORKED UP FRONT.
Duaine
On 07/20/2011 11:09 AM, William Monroe wrote:
 Which is precisely my point.  You don't care about the functioning of the 
rganization.  Some of us do.  Those of us 
 who are members have a vested interest in the organization doing well.  Some 
f us are willing to accept an initial 
 compromise in the functioning of the list to improve (maintain) the 
unctioning of the organization as a whole. 
  Without the organization, there is no list, Duaine.

 William R. Monroe



 On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Duaine Hechler <dahechler at att.net 
mailto:dahechler at att.net>> wrote:

     Again, William,

     My membership DOES NOT come into play in this discussion - SO - just drop 
t.

     FYI, I was a member until I could not afford the dues and the overall 
ubject matter did not include much about
     the antique player systems.

     PLUS, as in what a lot of other persons are saying, who gives a rats arse 
bout the home office - to us
     (non-members included), it's all about the tech list (functionality, ease 
f use, syncing with other devices, etc)

     Duaine


     On 07/20/2011 10:45 AM, William Monroe wrote:

         Again, Duaine,

         It goes beyond the list serv and it's function.  It encompasses all of 
he PTG organizational functions as well.

         As a non-member I can see how that is meaningless to you, but to some 
f us it does matter.

         William R. Monroe




         On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Duaine Hechler <dahechler at att.net 
mailto:dahechler at att.net>
         <mailto:dahechler at att.net <mailto:dahechler at att.net>>> wrote:

            Here we go again .........

            I thought this subject was supposed to be banned - I know I got my 
ast email "slapped" for bringing this
         up again.

            So now that it is here again, I'll chime in again.

            Comparison of the new list, is like the Edsel.

            It was ahead of it's time ..... not well accepted ..... and became 
 rare antique very quickly.

            I see the new list going in the same direction.

            As you can see, this was submitted under the old list - only.

            Regards, Duaine

            P.S. What happened to the old adage - "if it ain't broke, don't fix 
t" ?!?!?!?!?

            On 07/20/2011 09:11 AM, William Monroe wrote:

                Will,

                I can't say that I condone Israel's approach to "encouraging" 
veryone to use the new system.  I can say,
                however, that your suggestion, you quoted,

                "If a thing can be done adequately by means of one, it is 
uperfluous to do it by means of several; for we
                observe that nature does not employ two instruments [if] one 
uffice”.  That’s a pretty good measure
         for any
                software interface design.  By that measure, to claim that the 
ew HL forum software represents a paradigm
                shift is laughable."

                It is essential that everyone who reads this forum (and who 
ill eventually be using the new system)
                understands that the paradigm shift (it really is) reaches far 
eyond email lists.  The new software works
                wonderfully for so much of what the home office needs it to do 
o track and maintain membership,
                communications, and the integrating so many needs for the 
rganization - of which the email list is
         only one.

                Please understand, I value the list as much as anyone, and I 
on't mean to imply that the new system is as
                simple as the old.  Neither do I intend to denigrate any of 
t's users.  However, there are other
                considerations for PTG besides the list.  The new software does 
 remarkable job filling the needs of
         the PTG
                and incorporating the lists as well.  I'll say it again because 
t is extremely important that we on
         the list
                fully understand:  the needs of PTG are much more than just the 
ist.

                To be sure, the list is important and it was considered.  And, 
t does continue to function on the new
                software.  It is absolutely different.  It is in some ways more 
roublesome.  It is in some ways
         better.  List
                folks (and I include myself in that number) need to move past 
he initial frustrations, log on, take
         the time
                to get set up as your needs see fit, and learn to use it.  If 
e simply refuse to use it, it will never
         work
                for us.  I'm discovering that as I use it more, it becomes 
astly simpler.

                Again, the new software is a big step forward for the PTG on 
he organizational level.  It may
         complicate the
                list function for a bit until we all take the time to learn to 
se it effectively, but it will happen.

                William R. Monroe




                On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Encore Pianos 
encorepianos at metrocast.net
         <mailto:encorepianos at metrocast.net> <mailto:encorepianos at metrocast.net 
mailto:encorepianos at metrocast.net>>
         <mailto:encorepianos at metrocast.net <mailto:encorepianos at metrocast.net> 
mailto:encorepianos at metrocast.net
         <mailto:encorepianos at metrocast.net>>>> wrote:

                   Dear Isreal:

                   Hmmmm….     “:fellow luddites”, “horse and buggy drivers 
omplaining how difficult it is to start a
         car”,
                   “horseshit”, “can the attitude”, “small but loud group who 
efuse to develop basic web skills”
         “files YOU
                PEOPLE
                   were shoving onto my computer (caps added by me, wow, a 
onspiracy, what fun!)  “massaging each
         other’s egos”

                   And now for the real kicker, “the relatively minor glitches 
hat any paradigm shift entails”.   PARADIGM
                   SHIFT?????!!!!!!!!,  Isn’t that a bit like a 2 ½  foot tall 
uy dunking the ball into a basket 2
         feet off the
                   ground and claiming “player of the year?”

                   Jon Page doesn’t need me to defend him and I won’t speak for 
im.  I will say that I have met Jon
         and spent a
                   little time with him, and have followed his posts on the 
orum over the past years.  Somehow,
         luddite  never
                   enters my mind when I think of Jon.  And please note that 
he group of people you describe as
         luddites and
                horse
                   and buggy drivers includes the following people, if we are 
ncluding those who have expressed their
         lack of
                   enthusiasm for the new forum:   Del Fandrich, Ron Nossaman, 
ale Erwin, David Andersen,  and David Love;
                amongst
                   many ohers.

                   I admire both Del and Ron for their approach to problem 
olving and design, because they so well
         apply these
                   variations on “Occam’s Razor”,   “Simplicity is the ultimate 
ophistication” and “Entities must not be
                multiplied
                   beyond necessity”.  It is always  a sign of an elegant and 
enetrating mind to seek the simplest and
         most
                 direct
                   solution.that fulfills all necessary criteria.

                   I think this saying from Saint Thomas Aquinas is most 
opical when thinking of software,
         particularly the HL
                   PIanotech web software: "If a thing can be done adequately 
y means of one, it is superfluous to do
         it by
                means of
                   several; for we observe that nature does not employ two 
nstruments [if] one suffice”.  That’s a
         pretty good
                   measure for any software interface design.  By that measure, 
o claim that the new HL forum software
                represents a
                   paradigm shift is laughable.

                   Will Truitt



            --     Duaine Hechler
            Piano, Player Piano, Pump Organ
            Tuning, Servicing&  Rebuilding
            Reed Organ Society Member
            Florissant, MO 63034
         (314) 838-5587 <tel:%28314%29%20838-5587> <tel:%28314%29%20838-5587>
         dahechler at att.net <mailto:dahechler at att.net> <mailto:dahechler at att.net 
mailto:dahechler at att.net>>
         www.hechlerpianoandorgan.com <http://www.hechlerpianoandorgan.com> 
http://www.hechlerpianoandorgan.com>

            --
            Home&  Business user of Linux - 11 years





     -- 
     Duaine Hechler
     Piano, Player Piano, Pump Organ
     Tuning, Servicing&  Rebuilding
     Reed Organ Society Member
     Florissant, MO 63034
     (314) 838-5587 <tel:%28314%29%20838-5587>
     dahechler at att.net <mailto:dahechler at att.net>
     www.hechlerpianoandorgan.com <http://www.hechlerpianoandorgan.com>
     --
     Home&  Business user of Linux - 11 years




- 
uaine Hechler
iano, Player Piano, Pump Organ
uning, Servicing&  Rebuilding
eed Organ Society Member
lorissant, MO 63034
314) 838-5587
ahechler at att.net
ww.hechlerpianoandorgan.com
-
ome&  Business user of Linux - 11 years

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20110720/4e54c234/attachment.htm>


More information about the pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC