Is the letoff rail detachable? Setting the jack position is a pre-regualtion step, why not just remove the rail, adjust the Jacks, put that puppy back on and check the letoff again? There's more than one way to skin a cat. Laura Olsen On Jan 26, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Joseph Garrett wrote: > This question was posted on the "new list". Since I only "skulk" and don't > post there, hopefully someone, (Maybe Jim I.), will forward this to > whoever.<G> > Here tis' > > "3.From: Jim Ialeggio > Posted: 2012/01/25 9:23:00 AM > Subject: German factory explanation in gubashali english > Message: OKay language fans, here's a puzzler for you. > > I'm regulating (or rather attempting to regulate) an August Foerester > Grand, 190 Circa 2002. Current production Renner action/stack. > > Action and touch are quite nice, so geometry is working fine. > > The letoff dowels are screwed up, way high at the top of their travel, very > close to actually contacting the bottom of the hammer rail. I can get > letoff nice and close without being limited by the dowels hitting the > hammer rail bottom. > > Problem: With the letoff dowels in this position, it is physically > impossible to adjust the jack screws...absolutely no clearance to reach > around the dowel, and no clearance to get the tool between the dowels and > back into the vicinity of the jack screw without bending the letoff > dowels/screws out of the way. No can do. > > The best option to me seems to be to remove the dowels and shorten the top > of the dowel by 3/16-1/4", as the jack screw, at rest, is lying just below > the bottom of the hammer rail. This assumes shortening the dowel, which is > at the top of the screw travel, will still leave me with sufficient screw > treads in the dowel...I think it will. > > The puzzler...Here is what the techs at Foerester said(Germany, I think in > what used to be East Germany), when I asked them what they had in mind: > > "if you want adjust the jack adjustment screw you must put away the letoff > dowel real." > > Hey Jurgen...you out there. > > I think they want me to lower the letoff dowel way out of the way, adjust > the jack screw, and then raise the dowel after the jack is adjusted. This, > to my way of regulating, which checks each adjustment, especially the jack > and rep height adjustments, multiple times during the regulation, besides > being ridiculously inefficient, will limit what I can give the pianist...an > excellent client, who is a fine pianist. > > What's your take on that gubashali instruction?" > > Jim Ialeggio, > There are two ways to address the jack adjustment issue. One: make a tool > out of a 1/16" drill rod w/an 1/8" steel head welded to the rod end. Cut a > slot into the end of the 1/8" head. Then silver solder "sweat solder" a > brass sleeve over that head Put a handle on it w/ a "flat" that is > parallell to the slot, (for reference). > Or....Two: remake the let-off button rail to allow more range of > adjustment. (Hint: if you turn the action upside down, you'll see that the > let-off rail is attached to the hammer rail with screws!!!!<G>) Of course, > you'll probably have to "slightly" modifiy the hammer rail as well, > but....whatever it takes to overcome crappy engineering. Right?!! Right!! > Best Regards, > Joe > > > Joe Garrett, R.P.T. > Captain of the Tool Police > Squares R I >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC