[pianotech] Hammer Blow

[Floyd Gadd]

This makes sense Jon.  I'll probably regulate groups throughout the compass of the keyboard to get the learning benefit out of the exercise, rather than setting the hammerblow this way on every single key.  At the end of the day I do in fact intend to do what you are recommendng.  Thanks for your help in clarifying where I need to end up.FloydJon wrote:Your hammer line will become erratic by doing this because of the 
slightly different Key Ratios between notes. That procedure is what you 
do to set an even touch with a priority given to aftertouch. But to do 
this, you alter the dip not the blow distance. Keys level, hammer line 
level, key dip slightly uneven. The pianist feels a even aftertouch and 
not an uneven key dip. Altering the blow on an individual basis will 
introduce volume discrepancies brought on by varying blow distances.

Aftertouch calibration by varying dip slightly is essential to a smooth 
feeling action.

-- 
Regards,

Jon PageFloyd wrote:>This week I'm going to see what happens to my hammer line if I set 
hammer blow to achieve a specified amount of aftertouch.  I've set the 
key height, >key dip and letoff.  I'll put the action in the piano, use 
a .045 punching with a notch cut out so I can slide it onto the front 
rail pin over the cloth >punching with the key installed, and set the 
hammer blow for each of the white keys such that a weight on the key (I 
forget how many grams, and I'm >not in the shop to check) brings it 
almost to let-off, and a slight downward tap on the key will take it 
through let-off. Theoretically, the straightness of >the hammer line I 
achieve with this procedure should allow me to evaluate how successful I 
was in setting even key dip and consistent aftertouch.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20121009/15519609/attachment.htm>