Hi Jim: Did you get a chance to look at that Steingraeber Phoenix at Larry Buck's shop in May when we were there for the Bill Shull Steinway Patent day? I know you were there because you had to sit next to me, you poor soul. If Larry still has that piano, you could probably give him a call and ask him to take some measurements for you. I spent some time listening to that piano, both with my hand and others playing it. There was much to like about it (I favored it over the "regular" bridged Steingraeber next to it, it was well voiced and seemed to have good volume and sustain.) It did lack what I might call dynamic excitement and was a bit linear as it stepped up the loudness ladder. It sounded like a very good piano with bearing a bit on the shallow side, to my ear. Understand that these are small criticisms, I did like the piano. What did bother me more was what I would call a "warble" that seemed to be there on all of the notes, and was more audible than I would have preferred. On louder playing, the piano sounded a bit overloaded, perhaps due to bridge agraffe leakage. This is speculation on my part, but there really seems to be only one point of contact for termination on this system and the Stuart agraffe as well, although they are slightly different from one another. Since piano wire is round, and that wire is bearing against the rounded over, straight edged termination piece, it seems to me that there is only a single very narrow point of contact between the string and the bridge terminus. Of course, there is the bearing force of the string deflection along with its tension to press and hold the wire to the termination. Let's compare that to our bridge pin drilled at an angle of about 70 degrees in relation to the bridge top. The side bearing presses the wire into this angled corner, against two bearing surfaces. When life is good (tight bridge pins, good notching, etc. etc.) the sound will be very clean and it will be a sufficiently secure termination. Contrast this to our bridge agraffes with their single point of contact. It seems that it has to be less secure, the bearing forces of the deflected wire notwithstanding. When the hammer sets the string into motion, it doesn't just vibrate in the vertical plane, but in the horizontal plane, and everything in between. I can't help but believe that this singular termination point is insufficient to constrain the wire adequately in the other planes, and perhaps even less well so in the vertical plane. Hence the noisiness these agraffes seem to have at higher volume levels. Or, at least that is my theory. There is another potential problem with this design, at least as it is implemented individually by Stuart and Dain. In both these designs the terminating pieces are separate pieces from the main body of the agraffe. Stuart's design has something akin to a bridge pin laying on its side in a curved well in the main body of the agraffe. As far as I can see from looking at pictures of the agraffe, it is held in position only by the downward pressure of the strings. I don't know if they are epoxied in place. If not, is this secure enough to not allow any movement in position? I am not so sure that it is. Consider how little insecurity it seems to take for a traditional bridge pin to start getting false. The Dain agraffe is this triangular shaped piece that goes through an opening at the front and back of the bridge. There is a screw that holds the agraffe securely to the bridge, and presumably that presses into the tapered sides of the termination piece. Is that sufficiently secure to not cause problems? I am not so sure it is, either. I would enjoy other's reflections and comments on this, as there is a lot more I would like to understand more about how all this stuff works together. Will Truitt -----Original Message----- From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Jim Ialeggio Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 9:15 AM To: pianotech at ptg.org Subject: [pianotech] Bridge agraffes FYI meant to add... Has anyone seen the bridge height on a Steingraber Phoenix or Stuart Piano, or indeed a retrofit (other than a base retrofit)? Jim -- Jim Ialeggio jim at grandpianosolutions.com 978 425-9026 Shirley Center, MA
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC