Certainly that is a reasonable thing to entertain. I would say focus on transitioning to Googletech in the near term (or long term, if that is how it works out) and explore the practicalities and costs for a New Pianotech separate from PTG. This way it could be planned carefully and in an unhurried way, if that is what people want. Will -----Original Message----- From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Joseph Giandalone Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 3:12 PM To: pianotech at ptg.org Subject: Re: [pianotech] Google groups (Horace) Yes, But don't you feel that the Google group could serve as a transition phase? It would take the heat off so that a more enduring solution could be put together carefully and calmly. No?? Joseph On Feb 26, 2013, at 12:28 PM, Encore Pianos wrote: > With respect for everyone's good intentions here, I think a fee service (which would be necessary to implement this) would be a real headache to administer outside the umbrella of some parent group (as PTG has done with Pianotech). We have a month to pull something together to create such a thing before this easy ability to communicate disappears with Pianotech. Practically speaking, going with one of the Google groups would likely be easier. > > Will Truitt
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC