[pianotech] Google groups (Horace)

[Susan Kline]

That sounds workable, Will. I'd put up with Google if it were just a 
transition
to something more secure later on.

I think what is an important point (which has not been directly stated
very often) is that New Pianotech would be planned and built by THE PEOPLE
WHO ACTUALLY USE IT, and who therefore care about it and understand it.

Those early days were magical, weren't they?

Susan

Encore Pianos wrote:
> Certainly that is a reasonable thing to entertain.  I would say focus on
> transitioning to Googletech in the near term (or long term, if that is how
> it works out) and explore the practicalities and costs  for a New Pianotech
> separate from PTG.  This way it could be planned carefully and in an
> unhurried way, if that is what people want.
>
> Will  
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf
> Of Joseph Giandalone
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 3:12 PM
> To: pianotech at ptg.org
> Subject: Re: [pianotech] Google groups (Horace)
>
>
> Yes,
>
> But don't you feel that the Google group could serve as a transition phase?
> It would take the heat off so that a more enduring solution could be put
> together carefully and calmly. No??
>
> Joseph
>
>
> On Feb 26, 2013, at 12:28 PM, Encore Pianos wrote:
>
>   
>> With respect for everyone's good intentions here, I think a fee service
>>     
> (which would be necessary to implement this) would be a real headache to
> administer outside the umbrella of some parent group (as PTG has done with
> Pianotech).  We have a month to pull something together to create such a
> thing before this easy ability to communicate disappears with Pianotech.
> Practically speaking, going with one of the Google groups would likely be
> easier.  
>   
>> Will Truitt
>>     
>
>
>
>
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20130226/5c4a1ed2/attachment-0001.htm>