Hi Fred, The early termination pieces were made of mild steel., They had the problem of grooving over a period of time with just the abrasion of tuning. Remove them resurface the profile. Heat to a dull cheery red and quench in a bucket of water. Better yet take them to a good machinist/backsmith, and have him case harden them. The newer terminations are case hardened, and had a new profile (radius) plus if you look carefully you will see they are different lengths. so as to be detuned from the fundamental. Regards Roger At 09:37 AM 6/12/2003 -0600, you wrote: > A colleague of mine (not subscribed to the list) has a problem > with a Baldwin concert grand in his care. It is a "modern design" Baldwin > - plate suspension system, acujust hitch pins, front termination system - > but an early version. Specifically, instead of individual "termination > units" (or whatever Baldwin calls them) for each unison, there is a > composite section for each of the upper treble sections. (Here a moment > of doubt enters my brain. I don't work on very many Baldwin grands, but > my impression is that every one I have seen has individual units for each > unison. Maybe my recollection is faulty. If so, please correct me, > somebody). By termination unit, I am referring to the substitute for capo > and v-bar, which terminates the speaking length and provides a duplex > segment as well. > The problem my colleague has described to me seems to be linked > to one of the termination sections. The symptom is a "zingy" sound, and > it is present in all but the last 2 to 3 notes of the section (the lower > of the two). Other potential sources of this noise seem to have been > eliminated from possibility. > THe "zing" phenomenon was present previously to some extent, but > suddenly (overnight, according to the owner, who is an accomplished and > dedicated pianist - recording artist and performer) it got much worse. > After trying a wide range of potential cures (none successful), my > colleague tightened the allen screws which attach the unit to the plate. > He said every one could be turned a bit, some quite a bit. THis didn't > eliminate the problem, but it made a marked improvement. > From the foregoing (and a lot of additional detail I am > omitting), it seems pretty clear that there is some problem with this > "termination section." The owner can't do without the piano for some > months, so further examination will be put off. It will probably involve > lowering tension of that section, quite likely removing those strings and > the the termination section and examining it. > Does this ring any bells for any of you. I am thinking Baldwin > would have had a good reason for changing from sectional units to > individual ones for each unison (if I am right that they did this). IOW, > they had warrantee problems. Did they develop cracks? If so, how would > one deal with them? Any feedback and suggestions would be most appreciated. > I should add that this instrument has been through a lot. It was > a touring concert instrument for many years, and could have suffered any > number of jars and drops over time. And the musician, though not by any > means destitute, is also not rolling in cash. So really major things like > plate replacement would not be in the cards. >Regards, >Fred Sturm >University of New Mexico >_______________________________________________ >caut list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC