---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment In a message dated 6/13/03 4:06:02 PM Central Daylight Time, Bdshull@aol.com writes: > Yes, there will be no additional skills test. No, since the CAUT > credential would be provided only to RPTs, who have been tested for basic skills. The > coursework would not provide the CAUT any more hands-on skills than the > Institute already provides to, say, rebuild pianos; however, additional CAUT > classes on managing rebuilding - spec'ing vendor rebuilding work and the like - > would help the CAUT to skillfully administer a program in the school. The > same with new purchases, lease programs, supervising work, interacting with > administration, dealing with the challenges of the smaller schools/contract > technician, prioritizing work, etc. > > A CAUT credential would be obtained from combining selected existing > Institute curricula with CAUT curricula. > > Bill The concept is very good. But I'm not sure if we need to go through a "certification" process to give a CAUT some sort of credibility. I think just offering classes on the topics you listed would be enough. The ones you listed would be ones I certainly would attend. And I wouldn't limit those classes to CAUTS. There are many techs who would get a lot out of those kinds of classes, just to deal with large public schools and/or churches. Wim ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/5b/0a/cf/97/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC