--On Friday, November 7, 2003 9:01 AM -0600 Mary Smith <marysmith@mail.utexas.edu> wrote: > Good point, Wim. Perhaps the Home Office could supply CAUT with the > information gained, and technicians could be contacted directly about > endorsing the Guidelines (which I finally just did myself, after some > minor procrastination). Fred and Don and company have worked hard enough > on this project that waiting a month or two for some more names might be > wise. What say you, Fred and Don? > > Mary Well, that might be a good idea. Kathy Maxwell (the home office person who has been working on getting the Guidelines into publishable shape) has been bugging me to get this completed, as people have been requesting copies. And she wants it done and out of her hair (a sentiment I share). I opened my dues invoice, looking specifically for the question about institutional affiliation, and didn't turn the form over, so I didn't see it. I was feeling disappointed that all the harrassment of board members by my cohort-in-crime Bill Shull was in vain. I guess another question to ask is how long it would take home office to compile all that data into a form that could generate a list of names, addresses, and emails. Comments, anyone? BTW, the list of endorsers is now at 61. Keep those cards and letters coming! Regards, Fred Sturm
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC