[CAUT] Update on Hamburg D voicing and collodion

PAULREVENKOJONES at aol.com PAULREVENKOJONES at aol.com
Tue Oct 5 18:21:02 MDT 2010


Israel:
 
Thanks for a very helpful report!
 
Paul
 
 
In a message dated 10/5/2010 5:44:48 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
custos3 at comcast.net writes:

Hello,

Following  up on a thread from August. I did find a good US source of 
usable collodion  (details in a second message) and we have been working on this 
piano for the  past 2 days under the guidance of an experienced collodion 
voicer (who has  chosen not to participate this thread - which leads me to 
believe that he  might want to remain anonymous on this list with regard to 
this matter). The  results are very encouraging. 

First about the stuff. It's collodion  USP diluted with amyl acetate. It's 
available in various dilutions - I chose  to order the thinnest (1%) 
solution. Amyl acetate for further dilution is also  available. The collodion is 
marked flammable, and it is volatile - but not so  much so that they couldn't 
ship it by overnight air (long story...)

We  first tested the stuff on an extra hammer from the same set - to see 
how fast  it soaks into the felt. Our mentor felt it was too slow (the amyl 
acetate  flashes off rather quickly - so it needs to carry the solids deep 
enough into  the felt before it reaches semi-solid state and can no longer 
propagate). We  decided that 1% wsa too thick - and cut it 1:1 with amyl acetate 
- in effect  creating 1/2% solution. 

We determined that the hammers from C#3 and  down needed "help" as well as 
the top 4 treble hammers. The solution is  applied to both sides of the 
hammer, by drops being dripped half way between  the strike point and the tip of 
the molding - and it spreads from there. We  turned the action on its end, 
juiced one side of the hammers, then flipped it  over and juiced the other 
side. We started with 2 drops on each side in the  tenor, 4 drops in the 
bichord and trichord sections of the bass and 6 drops in  the sigle strings 
(where the tone is weakest). In notes 85-88 we did 3 drops  on each side. The 
results were quite noticeable - but not enough (except for  note 85 which came 
up perfect) , and there was little effect on the top 3  notes. So we did a 
second round of adding various amounts of solution in  various sections - 
except that in the top 3 treble notes we put the stuff  directly on the strike 
point. This brought the tenor and top treble more or  less where they 
needed to be and made a major improvement in the  bass.

After this our mentor and the other technician left, and I  continued very 
slowly and carefully bringing up the bass by adding solution a  few drops at 
a time to those hammers and to others throughout the piano that  seemed to 
be a bit weaker than their neighbors (about a dozen all together). I  could 
do this, because the stuff feels dry to the touch after 10 minutes - and  is 
fully set after about 1/2 hour. Since I had to work in the concert hall  
between classes, I could check the tone 1/2 hour after juicing and then again  
after the class was over (and again this morning) - no change from what it 
was  after 1/2 hour. 

At this point I am really happy with the tenor,  satisfied with (though not 
ecstatic about) the bass bichords and trichords,  and still not really 
happy with the 8 bottom (single string) notes, though  they are much improved. 
I'll wait to hear what the other tech here thinks  before going any further 
(she'll be here Thursday). 

Some  observations:

1. I started with 30 ml. of 1% solution, and after about  5 rounds of 
juicing I still have about 25 ml. left. It really takes a tiny  amount to make a 
significant difference. The stuff is volatile, so it's best  not to get any 
more than necessary - who knows what the shelf life is, and how  the 
dilution might change once the packaging is open. But then you can always  get the 
right dilution empirically - by trying it out on a spare hammer of  similar 
density and diluting based on the propagation rate.

2. You  don't need to guess at how much solution you need to put in to the 
hammer on  the first pass - the stuff does not "seal" the felt like lacquer 
or glue it  together like plastics (keytop solution) so you can always add 
more. You can  work gradually, a few drops at a time, and stop when the 
desired result is  reached. 

3. If by some chance you should end up with too much solution  in the 
hammer(s) - no sweat. Just put a few drops of solvent (amyl acetate)  where you 
dripped the collodion, and it will dilute the stuff that's in the  hammer and 
spread it around over a greater area of the felt - bringing down  the tone. 

4. When dripped into the hammer's interior, it increases the  power with 
minimal effect on tone color. If you do want to brighten the tone,  you can 
either make sure that it wicks up from the interior of the hammer to  the 
strike point, or (if a big change is needed) drip directly on the strike  point. 

5. The diluting agent (amyl acetate) flashes off very quickly  (dry to the 
touch in a few minutes, pretty well set in 1/2 hr.) so you can  hear results 
very soon after juicing. You can get quite a bit of voicing done  in a 
short time.

Well, that's about it. So far I'll call this mostly  successful - with a 
few problems remaining in the deep bass. It's possible  that a better set of 
bass strings in the singles section might be the cure  there...

Collodion source details in a second message. 

Israel  Stein 




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut.php/attachments/20101005/f8f473c8/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the CAUT mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC