I would question the economy of replacing the hammers, but not the shanks and butts. I suppose that the butts 'might' be good enough to reuse, but how could the hammers be worn out, but not the butts? Kind of like buying new tires for a car, but not having the alignment done. The question about replacing vertical hammers reminded me that I had meant to ask a question earlier about hammer hanging. The new butts I have to install were drilled to receive the hammer shank about 1/8" further forward then the position of the hole on the original butts. The original hammers are 2-1/2" from bore to strike point. To use replacement hammers with the same bore length will not allow me to have the hammers strike at 90* to the string. And the different position of the hole in the new butts makes for a different angle of the shank against the hammer rail. So my new hammers don't line up with my guide hammers. What's the best thing to do here? Simply use a shorter bore distance? Plug and redrill these butts <gulp>? Look for other butts closer to the originals? (There don't seem to be lots of choices here). Is the main concern to have the hammers strike at 90* at the correct strike point? Gordon Large, RPT Maine Chapter (Hosting the 1997 NEECSO Seminar in Portland, ME. May 1-4)
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC