SAT-less

[David ilvedson]

> Date:          Mon, 17 Feb 1997 20:24:06 -0800 (PST)
> From:          Susan Kline <skline@proaxis.com>
> Subject:       Re: SAT-less
> To:            pianotech@byu.edu
> Reply-to:      pianotech@byu.edu

Susan,

Thanks for the clarification...Louise, excuse my ignorance...

ilvey, RPT





> If I may hop in?
> I've met Louise at conventions in Oregon.
> Louise Nicholson, R.P.T. (Rogue Valley Chapter)
>
>
> At 05:39 PM 2/17/97 +0000, you wrote:
> >> Date:          Mon, 17 Feb 1997 03:54:24 -0500 (EST)
> >> From:          LouNichol@aol.com
> >> Subject:       Re: SAT-less !!!!!
> >> To:            pianotech@byu.edu
> >> Reply-to:      pianotech@byu.edu
> >
> >Louise,
> >
> >You don't mention if your a member of the Piano Technician's
> >Guild.  If your not, consider joining up with a great organization.
> >Sounds to me like you might be ready to take the PTG tuning
> >test.
> >
> >ilvey, RPT
> >
> >
> >> I sent my SAT in a couple of months ago for servicing also and spent the next
> >> week tuning aurally as I had done for so many years.  I expected to spend an
> >> extra fifteen minutes or so to complete each tuning, but suprisingly by the
> >> end of the week I realized how much faster my aural tunings had become and
> >> how much better I was at listening since the last time I tuned aurally.  Not
> >> only that but I actually enjoyed tuning more in that week than the previous
> >> year of using the SAT.  It's a great tool and I continue using it on a daily
> >> basis (and I think the visual feedback has actually improved my aural tuning
> >> in the high treble) but I have to admit that it doesn't give me the personal
> >> satisfaction of completing a good tuning by ear and tuning fork alone.
> >> Louise Nicholson
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> Susan Kline, R.P.T.
> skline@proaxis.com
> P.O. Box 1651,
> Philomath, OR 97370
> (541) 929-3971
>
>
>
ilvey, RPT
Pacifica, CA