non-equal temperaments

Billbrpt@AOL.COM Billbrpt@AOL.COM
Tue, 9 Mar 1999 11:54:57 EST


In a message dated 3/3/99 9:39:28 PM Central Standard Time, jformsma@dixie-
net.com writes:

<< I have not been on the Pianotech list for all that long, but my dad and I
 talked about you before he died--how that you were an advocate of non-equal
 temps.  Since you mentioned the Acrosonic in your post Sunday, I thought I'd
 share the following with you.
 
 Today I tuned two Acrosonics.  One I tuned with the SAT using the standard
 FAC tuning. The other I tuned aurally using the temperament developed by
 Fairchild as described in the SAT manual (The "Piano Teacher's Delight").
 It was my first time to tune to a non-equal temp.  I noticed a pleasing
 difference in the two pianos, which surprised me somewhat. The equal temp
 piano sounded like most of the other spinets I've tuned--not too great.
 However, in the one tuned with the Fairchild temp, it seemed as if the lower
 bass was much more rich in the more "common" keys (C, D, G, etc.). There was
 some noticeable oddities in some of the keys, but not really all that bad.
 Since this was my first time to tune this way, I told the owner that she
 could play it for a month this way, and if she decided she did not like it,
 I'd retune it to equal temp at no charge.
 
 You are onto something, methinks.  If I may inquire.... What procedure do
 you use for tuning the non-equal temps?  Is it described in some literature,
 or is it something that you came up with on your own, or what? Do you have a
 way to use the SAT to tune all spinets and cheap consoles that are used
 primarily to play songs in C, F, Bb, etc.?  I am interested in giving the
 customer the best sound that the piano can have, and ET may not be for each
 piano. (We all seem to admit that it doesn't work for spinets.)
 
 Any info will be appreciated.
 
 Many thanks,
 
 John Formsma
 
This was a proper question to post on the List since it is of general interest
to piano technicians.  You have hit upon something which is becoming
increasingly obvious to growing numbers of technicians.  That which is
considered the ideal, the standard, the way tuning is approached for the PTG
RPT Exam, may not always be the very best way in all instances. 

 There are really an infinite number of ways to deviate from what many
consider to be the norm to produce a much more musically appealing tuning.
This does not mean that the norm is bad or substandard, it only places what
should usually be expected as a professionally done piano tuning at the lowest
common denominator.

Steve Fairchild came up with the very same idea that Antonio Francesco
Vallotti did in the 18th Century.  I really think it is the best introductory
Historical Temperament for contemporary technicians to try.  Professor Owen
Jorgensen RPT and Ed Foote recommend the Thomas Young #1 and I do not mean to
say they are wrong.  Either one will produce a similar sound.  There is even a
Valloti-Young temperament which is a compromise that really makes very little
difference in the outcome.

The reason I like the Vallotti is that it can be tuned from an A fork and it
is a very easy pattern to remember:  All 5ths between black keys and between a
black and white key are pure.  All others are tempered twice as much as they
would be in ET.

The Vallotti-Young compromise trades the 5th FC for the 5th BF#.  This
facilitates tuning from a C Fork.  If you tune from an A fork, your overall
pitch will be closer to standard than if you tune to a C fork.  

If you tune the Thomas Young #1 or the Vallotti-Young temperament, you'll have
to adjust the pitch of your C a bit higher to make your A really be 440 and
for the rest of the notes to be as close to theoretical Standard Pitch as
possible.

This kind of temperament is useful for virtually all music, not just for music
played in the simple keys.  Yet if that is a particular advantage in a certain
situation, then there is no reason not to use it.  Do not accept anyone's
accusation that it would be unethical to tune an Acrosonic this way whether or
not you disclose that information.  That is your prerogative.

If you or your customer feel that the remote keys are too harsh, there is also
a Victorian like compromise of this same idea that Michael Kimbell RPT came up
with a number of years ago.  He called it the "Rough & Ready" Temperament.
You simply divide all the Vallotti values in half.  The pure 5ths become
tempered by half the amount of ET and the tempered 5ths just slightly more
than in ET.  This will tone down the remote keys but diminish the gentle
quality of the home keys.  Sometimes, maybe most of the time, only a slight
contrast will yield the best results.  You have to find what works for you.

The Equal-Beating Victorian Temperament that I typically use is an adaptation
of the Rameau-Rousseau-Hall 18th Century Modified Meantone temperament.
Although it seems simple and natural for me to tune, I don't know of anyone I
have ever tried to teach it to who could ever do it.  So, I would recommend
that you stick with something that works for you for the time being.

An important consideration is your octaves, particularly in the Acrosonic.
Since your 3rds will not be even but very much affect the harmony your piano
will have, you need to familiarize yourself with the Cycle of 5ths and the
kind of beat speed you should expect from each 3rd, slow, medium or fast so
that you can manipulate 4ths, 5ths and octaves into something that sounds
musically appealing.

This is where the SAT can help you.  After you determine by ear what the best
compromise is, you make a programmed tuning and use it thereafter.  You always
need to check such a tuning aurally but it will give you the best foundation
possible.  This kind of customized manipulation of the scale cannot in any way
be achieved using deviations of an FAC program.

When you do this kind of work, you go beyond the lowest common denominator of
what is usually expected.  You conquer and make work for you that which all
the others condemn as a "poor scale" which "cannot" be properly tuned.  I took
the "Road Less Traveled" a good ten years ago and I haven't thought about
returning to the junction of the lowest common denominator ever since.

Bill Bremmer RPT
Madison, Wisconsin

 
 
 


This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC