> Not so fast small tech person........... Why do you think they used so many? >(not a single one was loose!) >Jim Bryant (FL) > Uh oh, Jim, now you've done it. You've asked my opinion. Well, fortunately, as it happens, I have one I haven't spent yet. First, why would the number of screws involved have any bearing on whether they are loose or not? I don't see a connection here. What do the plate screws do in the first place? I'd say they hold the plate flat to the back assembly, since the back is more resistant to the torsional forces involved than the plate is, and provide a solid anchor to the same back assembly to keep the plate impedance as high as possible (which is what the nose bolts are for too). Anything over a couple dozen or so screws (total) and two or more nose bolts (depending on the scale layout, strut location, and plate thickness, is job security for union screw installers, by my call. More (screws, not installers) wouldn't really serve any purpose other than to look like they must be important or they wouldn't have been installed. From a functional standpoint, I think you could leave every other one out in the webbing, and not notice any difference. In short (yea, right!) I think it's overkill, probably designed in on the premise that, if a few are necessary, a whole lot must be a whole lot better. Then again, maybe they had a massive overstock of screws that they had to use up before the yearly inventory. Another possibility. Are they in any particular pattern? Like, if you focus your eyes far enough past the surface of the plate, do alternate plate screws visually converge to form a picture of Elvis, or anything? Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC