advertising

[Wimblees@AOL.COM]

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
In a message dated 4/19/02 7:29:59 AM Central Daylight Time, 
mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com writes:


> Aren't there any ladies reading who are going to take issue with this 
> horribly sexist post!
> 
> Shame on you Wim!
> 
> Oops, did I just make one myself?   ;-)
> 
> Terry Farrell
>   
Terry

I personally do not see my post as being sexist. I see it as a fact. MOSTLY  
housewives read a "shopper". MOSTLY men read the paper. I didn't say only 
housewives or only men. That would have been sexist. 

BUT, if any women, or men, are offended by what I said, I apologize.

Wim 



> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <Wimblees@AOL.COM>
> To: <pianotech@ptg.org>
> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 12:13 PM
> Subject: Re: advertising
> 
> 
> > In a message dated 4/18/02 10:36:02 AM Central Daylight Time, 
> > pianowrmonroe@hotmail.com writes:
> > 
> > 
> > > I once took out an ad in the Services section of the Salt Lake Tribune 
> (Huge
> > > 
> > 
> > Local "shopper" type papers are better than the big newspaper. The 
> shoppers 
> > get read mostly by housewives, who look for bargains and coupons. The big 
> > paper gets read mostly by men for the news, sports and business. 
> > 
> > Wim 
> > 
> 
> 



---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/6d/ef/0e/e7/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--