>At 1:47 AM -0800 12/19/01, Robin Hufford wrote: >>In the interests of amicable discussion I would have to say however that >>as the members of this list are at least able to operate computers and are, >>evidently, literate, it is not likely they misconstrue what an >>accelerometer is >>or what it can do although in point of fact the motion itself is not what is >>measured but rather the time rate of change of velocity... > > >I'm afraid, Robin, that likelihood is very real indeed! It really >does appear that they think it is measuring bodily movement, >fantastic though you and I find that. > >JD Apparently so. I certainly don't see that it is logically reconcilable that a body can experience a change in velocity at a measurable rate without having moved. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC